Why Canada Needs to Double Home Construction Just to Reach 2019 Affordability

Why Canada Needs to Double Home Construction Just to Reach 2019 Affordability

You can't buy your way into a reasonable mortgage right now without weeping. Canada's housing market is completely broken, and the math proves it. According to the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC), this country must construct roughly 417,000 to 469,000 new housing units every single year until 2036 just to drag affordability back down to where it sat in 2019.

Right now? We are on pace to build about 231,000 homes annually. That leaves a staggering annual supply gap of nearly 200,000 missing doors.

If you're wondering why nobody can find a decent place to live, look no further than those numbers. Doubling our current construction output sounds nice on paper, but executing it requires dismantling the bureaucratic red tape choking our real estate sector.

The Brutal Reality of Canada's Housing Supply Gap

Let's look at the actual geography of this mess. Not every Canadian city is suffering equally, but the major hubs are bleeding out.

Take Montreal. The cost-to-income ratio there skyrocketed from 34 percent in 2019 up to 48 percent. That's the highest strain the city has seen since the 1990s. Montreal requires between 42,000 and 56,000 new starts every year to fix the deficit, but business-as-usual projections show them crawling along at barely 22,000.

Toronto and Vancouver face their own distinct nightmares. While Toronto's gap has narrowed slightly due to falling home prices, the region still needs up to 68,000 annual starts to balance local incomes. Meanwhile, Vancouver condominium starts crashed by 40 percent in the early stretch of 2016—oops, make that 2026—hitting lows not witnessed since 2011. High construction costs and miserable presale financing conditions are freezing developers in their tracks.

Edmonton stands virtually alone as a bright spot, maintaining a balanced market with almost no measurable supply gap. Everywhere else? A disaster zone.

Why Building More Apartments Won't Fix Everything

Governments love celebrating rental starts. Purpose-built rentals now make up about two-thirds of all apartment housing construction in major urban centers. Renters get some much-needed breathing room, sure.

Targeting rentals creates a secondary trap. If you skew the entire market toward rentals, you crush the pipeline for future homeownership. People get stuck paying skyrocketing rents forever, completely locked out of building equity.

Developers aren't building family-sized ownership options because municipal development charges, stubborn labor shortages, and high interest rates make high-density condos financial suicide. Presale requirements are so punishing right now that banks won't even look at a project unless half the units are pre-sold to investors who are also backing away.

What Needs to Change Right Now

Fixing this isn't rocket science, but it demands political courage that politicians rarely possess.

  • Axe development charges: Municipalities use developers as cash cows, slapping massive fees on new builds that get passed directly to buyers.
  • Modernize the workforce: We need a massive influx of skilled tradespeople. Handwringing about labor shortages doesn't lay bricks.
  • Speed up zoning approvals: Waiting years for municipal permits adds hundreds of thousands of dollars in carrying costs to a single project.

Until all levels of government stop treating housing as an ATM and start treating it as basic infrastructure, 2019 affordability will remain a distant, painful memory.

EW

Ethan Watson

Ethan Watson is an award-winning writer whose work has appeared in leading publications. Specializes in data-driven journalism and investigative reporting.